Legal Opinion
Rush, Urology Assoc. v. KUHN, SMITH & HARRIS, INC.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 8, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
193 N.J. Super. 389 (1984)
474 A.2d 1072
MARTIN RUSH, UROLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.A., WALTER KAHN AND MARCELLUS AND MASSELL, P.A., PARTNERS TRADING UNDER THE NAME OF 70 EAST AND MARTIN RUSH, UROLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.A., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, WALTER KAHN, AND MARCELLUS AND MASSELL, P.A., A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
KUHN, SMITH & HARRIS, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PAUL W. REILLY; JOHN C. MORRIS; FRAIOLI-BLUM-YESSELMAN AND PARTNERS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND FRAIOLI-BLUM-YESSELMAN AND PARTNERS, DEFENDANTS, THIRD…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ettin v. Ava Truck Leasing, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Stark Ritchie v. Ralph LandauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Goldstein v. DoftDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Edward Goldstein v. Max DoftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- McAndrew v. MularchukSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chattin v. Cape May Greene, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Pace v. KuchinskyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- Habick v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Manchester Tp. Bd. of Ed. v. Thomas P. Carney, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985