Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Doft

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 29, 1964PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEINFELD, District Judge.

Upon assignment of this case for trial, the defendant renewed his motion for judgment based upon the defense of res judicata, and plaintiff likewise renewed his motion to strike the defense. Judge Cashin, in denying the defendant’s motion, granted his alternative one to require plaintiff to set forth a more definite statement of his claim in order to permit adequate consideration of the res judicata plea. 1 Following service of plaintiff's amended pleading, Judge Levet denied his motion to strike the defense. These prior decisions do not preclude consideration of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Israel v. Wood Dolson Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Good Health Dairy Products Corp. v. EmeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Dictograph Products Company, Inc. v. Sonotone Corporation, Emil Henry Greibach and S. Michael PinelesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  5. In re Arbitration between Exercycle Corp. & MarattaNew York Court of Appeals · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Pike v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  3. Overseas Motors, Inc. v. Import Motors Limited, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1974
  4. Rodgers Builders, Inc. v. McQueenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Stark Ritchie v. Ralph LandauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API