Legal Opinion
Pace v. Kuchinsky
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 4, 2002PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
789 A.2d 162 (2002)
347 N.J. Super. 202
Louis PACE and Diane Pace, his wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Paul S. KUCHINSKY, John Kuchinsky, Defendants-Respondents, and
State Farm Insurance Companies, John Does 1 through 5 (gender neutral fictitious names) and ABC Corporation 1 through 5 (fictitious names), Defendants.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 27, 2001.
Decided February 4, 2002.
Michael Ventura, Summit, argued the cause for appellants (Ventura, Miesowitz, Albano & Keough, attorneys; Mr. Ventura, of counsel and on the brief).
Robert F. Cox, Cranford, argued the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Matter of Estate of DawsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- McAndrew v. MularchukSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Habick v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Selective Ins. Co. v. McAllisterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- Barker v. BrinegarNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Olivieri v. Y.M.F. Carpet, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- Allen v. v. AND a BROS., INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- Ivan v. County of MiddlesexDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- New Jersey Division of Youth & Family Services v. R.D.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- Riverdale Development Co. v. Ruffin Building Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.