Legal Opinion

McAndrew v. Mularchuk

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 2, 1962PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schettino, J.

This appeal is from an order of the trial court granting a motion striking compensatory damages as an issue in a new trial which was directed by our former opinion in this cause. 33 N. J. 172 (1960). Defendant’s motion was based upon the theory that at the original trial the jury had ascertained by its verdict the amount of compensatory damages regardless of who caused the injury and that plaintiffs, having once tried this issue, could not retry it before another jury.

A short summary of the litigation leading up to this appeal is as…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coca Cola Co. v. Pepsi-Cola Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1934
  2. Pinnix v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Cantrell v. Burnett & Henderson Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Betcher v. McChesneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  5. Harding v. CarrSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1951

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Zirger v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  2. John William Smith v. Dominick Spina, Individually and as Director of the Police Department of the City of Newark, N. J.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  3. Allesandra v. GrossNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  4. Reardon v. AllenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  5. NJ Manufacturers Insurance Co. v. BrowerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API