City of Ashland v. Hoffarth
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
In this eminent domain action, plaintiff (the city) sought to acquire certain interests in defendant’s property and to obtain a determination of just compensation for those interests. By a counterclaim, defendant asserted a right to compensation for a 20-foot-wide strip of land that he had previously dedicated to the city. The jury awarded more for the condemned property than the city had offered and granted defendant compensation for the 20-foot strip. The court then awarded defendant attorney fees on the condemnation claim and the counterclaim. The city appeals. We affirm the judgment on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Thornburg v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Suess Builders Co. v. City of BeavertonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Schafer v. Fraser Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wilson v. TobiassenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Neiss v. EhlersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Hill v. MayersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Natkin & Co. v. H.D. Fowler Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Courter v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.