Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Johnson v. Cahill

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, District J.

This is a civil action brought by the state upon the relation of the attorney general and R. B. Murphy against J. I. Cahill, to determine the title to the office of member of the board of administration as between said R. B. Murphy and the defendant J. I. Cahill. The trial court made findings and conclusions in favor of the plaintiff. Judgment was entered accordingly and the defendant has appealed.

The material facts are as follows: On January 1st, 1921, the defendant Cahill was appointed by the then governor to fill a vacancy caused by the resignation of one Casey. On January 5th, 1921,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Berge v. LansingNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. State ex rel. Lysons v. RuffWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. State ex rel. Bennetts v. DuncanMontana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. State ex rel. Egan v. SohramSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  5. Murphy v. Freeholders of HudsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Johnson v. BloomNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API