Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Lysons v. Ruff

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1892No. 369PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Superior .Court, Snohomish County. The facts are stated in the opinion. .

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, J. —

The relator was, at the time of and prior to the election held in 1890, the auditor of Snohomish county. At said election respondent was duly elected as his successor in office, but did not qualify by taking the proper oath of office and giving bond, within fifteen days after the service upon him of notice of his election, as required by the statute. About the 17th day of January following his election he completed his qualification by complying with the statutes in that regard, and entered upon the discharge of his dúties as such auditor.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. GageIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  2. State ex rel. Harris v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  3. People ex rel. Westcott v. HolleyNew York Supreme Court · 1834
  4. People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. In re the Executive Communication of the 1st of February, 1872Supreme Court of Florida · 1872

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Jones v. FarrarOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. State Ex Rel. Zempel v. TwitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State ex rel. Berge v. LansingNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Dumas v. GagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State Ex Rel. Wallace v. CallowMontana Supreme Court · 1927

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API