State ex rel. Berge v. Lansing
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Triéd. below before Tibbets, J. See opinions for reference to authorities.
1Opinion of the Court
Irvine, C.
The essential facts charged in the information herein are as follows: That at the general election of 1891 Isaac *516W.'Lansing was elected county judge of Lancaster county, and that he duly qualified and discharged the duties of his ■office; that at the general election in 1893 Lansing was reelected to said office and a certificate of election issued to him, but that he did not execute any official bond or file the same in the office of the county clerk within ten days after the 4th day of January, 1894, but that on the 25th ■day of January, 1894, Lansing did file a good and sufficient…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Ryan v. . GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- The People Ex Rel. Kelly v. . Common CouncilNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- The People Ex Rel. v. . NostrandNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Sprowl v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- Hurford v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Bartley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Commonwealth v. DiStasioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Town of Grove v. Haskell, GovernorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Elmen v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
- State ex rel. Little v. LanglieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.