Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Johnson v. Bloom

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1922Published

1Opinion

On petition for rehearing.

Pee Oueiam.

In this case defendant has petitioned for a rehearing. Tbe contention is that tbe former opinion is basically wrong; that tbe statute Comp. Laws, 1913, subd. 6, § 683 providing that an office shall become vacant upon the failure of the incumbent “to qualify as provided by law,” is directory merely, and does not of itself work a forfeiture, of tbe right to the office. Tbe question thus raised has been fully considered in tbe case of State ex rel. Johnson v. Cahill, post, 193 N. W. 938, decided herewith. Tbe opinion in that ease is a complete answer to tbe…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Johnson v. CahillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API