Legal Opinion

United States v. McGovern

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 3, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

I adjudge Patrick McGovern in contempt.

I. I have carefully read, twice, in full, the whole transcript of all the evidence given by Mr. McGovern which was embodied in the presentment before me. It is all relied on by the United States, and, in addition, the United States has filed certain specifications which constitute a kind of bill of particulars which are hereby referred to, and by such reference embodied in this opinion.1

II. The question of self-incrimination is not involved here in any way owing to the letter of May 9, 1932, in which the United States has released…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Michaelson v. United States Ex Rel. Chicago, St. P., M. & OR Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Ex Parte HudgingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Matter of DoyleNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. United States v. AppelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. SmythDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1952
  2. Theodore Collins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  3. Fleischer Studios, Inc. v. Ralph A. Freundlich, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1936
  4. In re BlimDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API