Legal Opinion

Fleischer Studios, Inc. v. Ralph A. Freundlich, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 4, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

My decision in this matter is as fol» lows:

1. The first exceptions filed in behalf of the defendants were improper in form and cannot be considered as consti tuting any challenge to the special master’s report.

2. The so-called amended exceptions filed in behalf of the defendants, after the expiration of the twenty-day period from the filing of the special master’s report, but without an extension of time and without any permission of the court, have no place in the record and must be as entirely disregarded as if they had never been filed.

3. I sustain the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schnell v. the VallescuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Medsker v. BonebrakeSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. In Re OsofskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
  4. Sheffield & Birmingham Coal, Iron & Railway Co. v. GordonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Gross v. Van Dyk Gravure Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fleischer v. A.A.P., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  2. Bar's Leaks Western, Inc. v. PollockDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1957
  3. Sammons v. LarkinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1940
  4. Davilla v. Brunswick Balke Collender Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API