Legal Opinion

Geisweit v. Marden

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County

Decided October 19, 1954Published

1Opinion of the Court

Greevy, J.,

Plaintiff brings this action in trespass and files his complaint to recover from defendants for personal injuries, for damages to his automobile and for loss of its use, and storage. Defendants’ filed preliminary objections to the complaint and jurisdiction and assigned the following reasons:

“I. 6. That the cause of action having been alleged to have arisen in Lycoming County [sic Clinton County] and personal service having been made on the defendant, M. E. Norman, in Clinton County, the Courts of Lycoming County are without jurisdiction in this case so far as concerns M. E. Norman.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Holt v. PariserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Stone v. C. I. T. Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Price v. NewellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  4. Horton v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Wolf v. Altoona & Logan Valley Electric Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API