In re Falcon Workover Co.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BARBIER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on motion by complainants in limitation, Falcon Work-over Co., Inc. (“Falcon”) to review an order of the magistrate judge regarding a vocational rehabilitation examination under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 35. Finding that the magistrate judge’s order is neither “clearly erroneous” nor “contrary to law”, the Court overrules the objection and AFFIRMS the order. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a).
REASONS
In this maritime limitation action, Falcon seeks to compel a personal injury claimant, Steven Sanders, to submit to a “vocational rehabilitation…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- James J. Acosta, Sr. v. Tenneco Oil Company and Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Fischer v. Coastal Towing Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1996
- Jefferys v. LRP Publications, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Stanislawski v. Upper River Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ornelas v. Southern Tire Mart, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
- Storms v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2002
- Bamberger v. United Natural Foods Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Barrett v. Illinois Central Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2024