Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Illinois Central Railroad Company

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided June 20, 2024No. 3:23-cv-02726Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS MARK E. BARRETT, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:23-CV-02726-SPM ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER McGLYNN, District Judge: Before the Court is a Motion for Vocational Rehabilitation Interview filed by Defendant Illinois Central Railroad Company. (Doc. 41). Illinois Central argues that good cause exists to require Plaintiff Mark E. Barrett to submit to a vocational rehabilitation interview pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 35 because Plaintiff Barrett has put his “physical condition,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Shumaker v. WestDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2000
  3. Soudelier v. Tug Nan Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1987
  4. Stanislawski v. Upper River Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
  5. Storms v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API