Hessenthaler v. Farzin
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order and decree nisi directing appellants to specifically perform their obligations under a land sales agreement dated November 17, 1985, and ordering them to convey the property at issue to appellees. Appellants contend that the court erred in directing specific performance because: (1) the court erroneously relied on oral testimony when it held that a memorandum existed sufficient to satisfy the Statute of Frauds; and (2) the only writing signed by appellants does not include the material term of financing. For the reasons that follow, we disagree,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ecksel v. Orleans Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Beeruk EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Irving v. Goodimate Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- American Leasing v. Morrison Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Burns v. BaumgardnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Donovan v. RRL Corp.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Flight Systems, Inc. v. Electronic Data Systems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Zuk v. ZukSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Long v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Trowbridge v. McCaigueSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.