Legal Opinion

Edmonds v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 18, 2002No. 20, Sept. Term, 2002PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

This case involves the exercise of peremptory challenges under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). The principle question raised in the certiorari petition is whether the trial court erred in creating a remedy after finding a Batson violation. Unfortunately, because the trial court failed to make the necessary findings as to purposeful discrimination required by Batson, we are unable to answer the question. We shall therefore remand the case to the trial court to enable the court to evaluate the credibility of the prosecutor’s race-neutral…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Peters v. Early Healthcare Giver, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  2. Montgomery Mutual Insurance v. ChessonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Ray-Simmons & McGouldrick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  4. Church v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  5. Elliott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API