Church v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
ADKINS, Judge.
In this case we address for the first time in a criminal law context whether the State has a privilege to refuse to disclose *654the exact location from which police have performed covert surveillance, even when a surveilling law enforcement officer testifies against the individual regarding the information gleaned from the surveillance. This privilege has been previously recognized by the Court of Special Appeals, and we confirm the existence of that privilege. We also resolve the question of what burden, if any, rests on the State to demonstrate the need for application of the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Rochkind v. StevensonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Stanley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Church v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.