Meachum v. Faw
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
McCRODDEN, Judge.
Plaintiffs’ sole argument on appeal is that the trial court erred in dismissing their complaint because it stated a claim for relief, to wit: negligent entrustment. For the reasons stated below, we reject this argument and affirm the order of the trial court.
In their complaint plaintiffs alleged that early in the morning of 31 December 1989, their decedent, Lee Ann Meachum, was driving defendant’s car under the express authority of defendant. The complaint also averred that:
[The decedent] was an unlicensed motor vehicle operator and that she. was 16 years of age, and that she…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Casebolt ex rel. Casebolt v. CowanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Hutchens v. HankinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Robinson v. Seaboard System RR, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lumsden Ex Rel. Estate of Lumsden v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2008
- Bailey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Jamar v. Patterson, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995
- Martell v. DriscollSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Coleman v. HinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.