Legal Opinion
Bailey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 28, 2008No. 88A01-0707-CV-306PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBB, Judge.
Case Summary and Issues
Noah Bailey appeals following a jury trial at which the jury found for the defendant below, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”). Bailey raises two issues, which we restate as whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying Bailey’s Motion to Conform Pleadings to the Evidence and in refusing to give Bailey’s tendered instruction regarding a theory of negligent en-trustment. Concluding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in either regard, we affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
On July 3, 1998, Bailey and…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Ayr-Way Stores, Inc. v. Chitwood Ex Rel. ChitwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Delta Tau Delta, Beta Alpha Chapter v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Casebolt ex rel. Casebolt v. CowanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Sports, Inc. v. GilbertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Chesterfield Management, Inc. v. CookIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Johnson v. WysockiIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
- Neal v. CureIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Hays v. RoyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Herland v. IzattUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- Gray v. D & G, INC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.