Legal Opinion

United States v. Akers

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 6, 2007No. Cr. 97-0072-01 (TFH)PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

THOMAS F. HOGAN, Chief Judge.

Pending before the Court are Akers’ “Motion To Be Relieved From Final Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) Of the Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure” (# 167) and the government’s motion to transfer Akers’ motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (# 170). Upon consideration of the motions, Akers’ opposition, and the record, the Court will grant the government’s motion and, accordingly, transfer Akers’ motion to the court of appeals.

I

On March 23, 1998, Akers pled guilty to conspiring to distribute and possessing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Castro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. United States v. Paul Winestock, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  4. Spitznas v. BooneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Mario Howard LloydCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Williams v. GonzalesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  2. United States v. TchibassaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  3. United States v. MitchellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. United States v. MathisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  5. United States v. PletnyovDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API