Legal Opinion
United States v. Tchibassa
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 27, 2011No. 1:91-cr-00560PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are (i) Mr. Tchibassa’s FRCP 60(b) Motion for Relief (the “Rule 60 Motion ”) from the Court’s August 21, 2009 judgment denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence (the “Habeas Motion ”) as expounded by a supplemental habeas brief filed on his behalf under the Inmate Legal Assistance Project (the “Supplemental Habeas Motion ”); (ii) the Government’s Motion to Transfer the Rule 60 Motion (the “Motion to Transfer ”); (iii) Mr. Tehibassa’s Motion to Strike the Government’s Motion to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Second Amendment Foundation v. United States Conference of MayorsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Paltz v. Alliance Healthcare Services, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- United States v. FarleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- United States v. NaranjoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- United States v. NaranjoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.