Legal Opinion
United States v. Mitchell
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 15, 2013No. Criminal No. 2005-0110PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is defendant Vernard Mitchell’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Because it appeared to the Court that Mr. Mitchell raised arguments for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c), the Court ordered the Government to address both statutory provisions in its response. In response, the Government moved to transfer the § 2255 claim, and opposed a sentence reduction pursuant to § 3582(c). Upon consideration of the record in this case, as well as the motions and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Burton v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Dorsey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- United States v. Edwina BigesbyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- United States v. FieldsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- United States v. McDadeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- United States v. MitchellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Wright v. BolsterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021