Legal Opinion
United States v. Mathis
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 5, 2009No. Criminal Action No. 97-334-1(CKK). Civil Action No. 09-708(CKK)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner Eddie J. Mathis’ second [418] Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. In response, the Government filed a[422] Motion to Transfer to the U.S. Court of Appeals Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence, in which the Government contends that this Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain Petitioner’s motion and must therefore transfer the motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. After thoroughly reviewing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Corley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Forest Grove School District v. T. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- In Re: Audwin Hawatha Taylor, MovantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. AkersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. TchibassaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- United States v. McDadeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- United States v. SummerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- United States v. TchibassaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011