Legal Opinion
Los Angeles City School District v. Tucker
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 11, 1929No. Docket No. 3756PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal by defendant Southern Surety Company from a judgment rendered in favor of defendant Patten Davies Lumber Company for the sum of $574.50, and from a judgment rendered in favor of defendant Noyes Marble Tile Company for the sum of $264.
The facts are not in dispute and are briefly these: Lewis Tucker, a contractor, entered into a contract with the plaintiff Los Angeles City School District on the twenty-seventh day of February, 1925, for the alteration and repair of a school building in the city of Los Angeles for the contract price of $2,298. On the same day said Lewis Tucker…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McIntyre v. HauserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Goldman v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Bird v. American Surety Co. of New YorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Dunlap v. Commercial National Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Simons Brick Co. v. HetzelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Van Orden v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Springer v. J. R. Clark Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Hollywood Holding & Development Corp. v. OswaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Oxnard School District v. PennCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933