Legal Opinion
Oxnard School District v. Penn
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 23, 1933No. Docket No. 4890PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
This action was begun by the Oxnard School District for the purpose of determining to whom the balance of a fund in its possession should be paid. The money on hand was deposited in court.
So far as this appeal is concerned, there is a controversy only between Jarrett Beckett, as appellant, and Peoples Lumber Company, a corporation, as respondent, and for purposes of convenience, Beckett will be referred to as the appellant, and the Peoples Lumber Company, a corporation, as respondent.
In April, 1929, Gr. E. Penn, a contractor, entered into a contract with the Oxnard School District of Ventura…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pierce v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- McIntyre v. HauserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Goldman v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Dunlap v. Commercial National Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Wheatley v. StrobeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- First National Bank v. Pomona Tile Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
- Cannon v. ChapmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938