Dunlap v. Commercial National Bank of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Stewart & Stewart and L. B. Stanton for Appellant. Geo. M. Barker and S. M. Bernard for Respondent Dunn. James, Smith & McCarthy for Respondent Bank.
1Opinion of the CourtBrittain, J.
From a single judgment and on a single transcript the administrator of the estate of John W. Kenton appeals in these consolidated cases. The record shows that the respondent Dunn sued the respondent bank, claiming that Kenton in his lifetime had made an equitable assignment of the entire balance to his credit with the bank and had given her a check for the entire balance, payment of which was refused by the bank when it was presented after his death. After the Dunn suit was commenced Dunlap, as administrator of Kenton’s estate, sued the bank on another check drawn by him as administrator for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Estate of Dutard v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Goldman v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Donohoe-Kelly Banking Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by22 opinions
- Guggenhime & Co. v. LamantiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- In Re Bank's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- In Re Odberg's EstateIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
- Baumgarten v. California Pacific Title & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Union State Bank v. Peoples State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.