Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Road Commission v. Danielson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1952No. 7752PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Chief Justice.

Action by the State of Utah, by and through the State Road Commission, to condemn two small tracts of land owned by the respondents at 6200 South Street and Highland Drive in Salt Lake County. After determining the amount of damages sustained by the respondents, the trial court awarded them interest on that amount at the rate of eight per cent per annum from the date of the order of immediate occupancy (entered by the court shortly after the complaint was filed) to the date of judgment. The State appeals, contending that interest should have been allowed only at the rate…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of City of N.Y. (Bronx River Parkway)New York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Simms v. DillonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Oregon Short Line R. Co. v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Salt Lake & U. R. Co. v. SchrammUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Utah Copper Co v. Montana-Bingham Consol. Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Utah State Road Commission v. FribergUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State Ex Rel. Engineering Commission v. PeekUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Maw v. NobleUtah Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Utah State Road Commission v. FribergUtah Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API