Legal Opinion

Oregon Short Line R. Co. v. Jones

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1905No. 1595PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Salt Lake County; S. W. Stewart, Judge. Actions by tbe Oregon Short Line Railroad Company against William R. Jones, Jr., and others. From judgments in favor of plaintiff in each case, defendants therein appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.

These actions (three of them) were commenced by respondent against appellants to condemn certain lots situated in Salt Lake City. By agreement of parties the actions on appeal are consolidated and .this opinion disposes of all of them. Appellants appeal from the final judgment and order of condemnation, and the only question presented is whether the appellants were entitled to interest upon the assessment of compensation, as found by the jury, from the date of the service of summons in the action.

Sections 3593, 3594, Revised Statutes 1898, provide that proceedings for condemnation must be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. South Park Commissioners v. DunlevyIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Burt v. WigglesworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  5. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HaysNebraska Supreme Court · 1883

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Fell v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Utah State Road Commission v. FribergUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State Ex Rel. Engineering Commission v. PeekUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Orono-Veazie Water District v. Penobscot County Water Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  5. Independent School District v. C. B. Lauch Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1957

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API