Legal Opinion

Maw v. Noble

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1960No. 9107PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDonough, justice.

This appeal challenges a determination that the interest on the damages awarded in a condemnation suit is a part of “amounts recovered” under an attorneys’ contingent fee agreement.

Brack Howard Noble and his wife, Ann, were named defendants in a condemnation suit by the state to take land they owned lying in the path of proposed improvements to U. S. Highway 91 just north of Salt Lake City, near the Salt Lake-Davis County lines. After negotiations with the state upon appraisers’ figures varying between $57,000 - and $72,000 they refused to accept $80,000 from the- state and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ephraim Theatre Company v. HawkUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  2. State Ex Rel. Road Commission v. NobleUtah Supreme Court · 1959
  3. State ex rel. Road Commission v. DanielsonUtah Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bunnell v. BillsUtah Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Coulter & Smith, Ltd. v. RussellUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Vernon v. Lake MotorsUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Utah State Medical Ass'n v. Utah State Employees Credit UnionUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. GENERAL APPLIANCE CORPORATION v. Haw, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API