Utah Copper Co v. Montana-Bingham Consol. Mining Co.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.
The Utah Copper Company, the respondent here and plaintiff below, and the Montana-Bingham Consolidated Mining Company, the principal defendant below and appellant here, are each engaged in mining in the West Mountain Mining District, near Bingham, in Salt Lake county. The Montana-Bingham Consolidated Mining Company, being the chief defendant and appellant, will thus be referred to as the defendant and appellant. In 1907, the plaintiff, who is and for many years has been engaged in mining copper in the district, obtained from the defendant and its predecessor, and from other mining claimants,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Westmoreland N. Gas Co. v. DeWittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Brown v. SpilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Fairbanks v. WarrumIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Lanyon Zinc Co. v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Crescent Mining Co. v. Silver King Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1898
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Utah State Road Commission v. FribergUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Riordan v. WestwoodUtah Supreme Court · 1949
- Moyle v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1947
- Utah Copper Co. v. Stephen Hayes Estate, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1934
- Stephens Hays Estate, Inc. v. TogliattiUtah Supreme Court · 1934
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.