Legal Opinion

Evac, LlC v. Pataki

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided March 3, 2000No. 7:99-cv-01121PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM — DECISION & ORDER

McAVOY, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, Evac, LLC (“Evac”), commenced this action on July 21, 1999 alleging claims under the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, 15 U.S.C. § 1, et. seq. (“Sherman Act”), the Clayton Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15, et. seq. (“Clayton Act”), and New York’s Donnelly Act, N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 340(1) (“Donnelly Act”). Evac further asserts claims under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Defendants violated its rights under the Due Process Clause, Equal Protection Clause, Takings Clause, and the Federal Aviation Act, 49 U.S.C. § 40101,…

2Cases cited81 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Prince v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  2. Chrebet v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  3. Tuchman v. ConnecticutDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
  4. Nat'l Rifle Ass'n of Am. v. CuomoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2018
  5. Mair v. CITY OF ALBANY, NEW YORKDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API