Legal Opinion

Chournos v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 1, 1952No. 4306_1PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PICKETT, Circuit Judge.

■ The plaintiff, as owner of a large tract of unfenced grazing land in Utah, brought this action under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(b), to recover damages resulting from the alleged improper administration of' the Taylor Grazing Act, 43 U.S.C.A. § 315 et seq., on public lands contiguous to lands owned and controlled by plaintiff and within the limits of Utah Grazing District No. 1, otherwise known as Promontory Grazing District. This appeal is from a judgment in favor of the defendant.

The district, located in northwestern Utah, was created in April of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  2. Cromelin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
  3. Oman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  4. Sickman v. United States (Two Cases). Ryal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  5. Kendrick v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1949

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Hatahley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Blessing v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Federal Lands Legal Consortium v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  4. Ernest J. Hendry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  5. John C. Gross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API