Legal Opinion

Volvo Car Corp. v. Hopkins

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1993No. 93-SC-294-MRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBSON, Justice.

This was an original action filed in the Kentucky Court of Appeals seeking a writ of mandamus against Fayette Circuit Judge John R. Adams ordering him to vacate a discovery order. The trial court’s order forbids the appellees (Hopkinses) from contacting non-party witnesses in a products liability ease against Volvo Car Corporation and others (Volvo). The Hopkinses (plaintiffs below) filed suit claiming Jacqueline Hopkins sustained serious injuries when their Volvo, which was parked in their driveway with the engine running, suddenly and inexplicably accelerated out of control.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Bender v. EatonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  3. Montgomery Elevator Co. v. McCullough Ex Rel. McCulloughKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  4. John E. RYE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BLACK & DECKER MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  5. Meredith v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rehm v. ClaytonKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. OverstreetKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Kentucky Central Life Insurance Co. v. StephensKentucky Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Inverultra, S.A. v. WilsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Finance and Administration Cabinet v. Hon Thomas D. Wingate Judge, Franklin Circuit CourtKentucky Supreme Court · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API