Legal Opinion

Inverultra, S.A. v. Wilson

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 2014No. 2013-SC-000345-MRPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

JUSTICE ABRAMSON

Inverultra, S.A., appeals from an order of the Court of Appeals denying writs of mandamus and prohibition. Inverultra seeks the lifting of a protective order and the issuance of orders compelling the real parties in interest, Union Underwear Company, Inc., and Parque Industrial Búfalo, S.A. de C.Y., to respond to certain discovery requests Inverultra has propounded in a judgment-enforcement action in the Warren Circuit Court. The Court of Appeals denied relief upon finding that the trial court’s protective order did not amount to an abuse of discretion.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. MaricleKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Bender v. EatonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  3. Cox v. BradenKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Inter-Tel Technologies, Inc. v. Linn Station Properties, LLCKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Texaco, Inc. v. BordaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. ChauvinKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Appalachian Racing, LLC Real Party in Interest v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Kentucky Horse Racing CommissionKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Louisville Metro. Sewer v. T+C ContractingMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Allen Lloyd Lehmann v. Hon Susan Schultz Gibson Judge, Jefferson Circuit CourtKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Finance and Administration Cabinet v. Hon Thomas D. Wingate Judge, Franklin Circuit CourtKentucky Supreme Court · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API