Legal Opinion
Kaltenbach v. Benisch
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 29, 1937PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*789Order restraining, pendente lite, the unauthorized operation of a gasoline station affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The granting of the restraining order was not an abuse of discretion. (Rice v. Van Vranken, 132 Misc. 82; affd., 225 App. Div. 179; affd., 255 N. Y. 541; Cohen v. Rosevale Realty Co., Inc., 120 Misc. 416; affd., 206 App. Div. 681.)
Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., dissents, with opinion.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rice v. Van VrankenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Rice v. Van VrankenNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Rice v. Van VrankenNew York Supreme Court · 1928
- Cohen v. Rosedale Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1923
- Cohen v. Rosevale Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lesron Junior, Inc. v. FeinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- Bazinsky v. Kesbec, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Bailer v. RingeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Daub v. PopkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- Mechtold v. TilfordNew York Supreme Court · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.