Bailer v. Ringe
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to enjoin the use of premises for a funeral chapel or undertaking business or any other business, judgment dismissing complaint on the merits reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and new trial granted. For the purpose of the new trial, findings of fact and conclusions of law are reversed. Although the restrictive covenant invoked by plaintiff could not be enforced for the reason that the common grantor, Manor Bealty Co., through which plaintiff’s title devolved, did not set up uniform restrictions (Korn v. Campbell, 192 N. Y. 490), and the conduct of the business may…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Korn v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Francis v. . SchoellkopfNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Rice v. Van VrankenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Rice v. Van VrankenNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Rice v. Van VrankenNew York Supreme Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lesron Junior, Inc. v. FeinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- Daub v. PopkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- Lustgarten v. 36 C. P. S. Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1950
- Bailer v. RingeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Bazinsky v. Kesbec, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.