Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Rosevale Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1923PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We are not disposed to interfere with the discretion, of the justice at Special Term, who granted the_ motion for a temporary injunction. The ease should *682be tried, and the rights of the parties determined upon findings of fact and conclusions of law made after a trial. (Bergen Beach Land Corporation v. City of New York, 192 App. Div. 884.) Kelly, P. J., Manning, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bergen Beach Land Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pritz v. MesserOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Rice v. Van VrankenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  3. Gauthier v. Village of LarchmontAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  4. Kaltenbach v. BenischAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  5. People v. Margolies, New York County Courts1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API