Legal Opinion
Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Lindholm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 12, 1933No. 6901PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.
Albert L. Lindholm, deceased, was, at the time this action was commenced, the administrator of the estate of Peter L. Lindholm, deceased. Peter L. Lindholm, deceased, was the father of said administrator and of appellee, Emil G. lindholm. His estate was probated in tlie Superior Court of the state of California for the county of Los Angeles. The decree of distribution of said estate, dated March 2, 1927, ordered that the cash belonging thereto, in the amount of $18,-230.09, “be distributed to Emil G. Lindholm, son of decedent.” Emil G. Lindholm’s distributive share of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mercantile Trust Co. v. HenseySupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Buckstaff v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Whitney v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- County of Sonoma v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Russell M. Smith v. John J. Cremins, Jr., John F. Mahon, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- City of Los Angeles v. Belridge Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Hallinan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Cannon v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Abram v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1942
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.