Legal Opinion

Hellwig v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 1919No. Civ. No. 1923PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This is an action on a notary public’s surety bond executed by the defendant, and grows out of an alleged false acknowledgment by the notary of the execution of a certain deed of trust.

It appears that one Frank L. Dreischmeyer was, on the thirty-first day of August, 1910, a duly appointed, qualified, and acting notary public, in and for the county of Santa Clara, and that the defendant had become and was on said date a surety on his official bond as such notary; that, on said thirty-first day of August, 1910, and while said bond was a valid, subsisting obligation and on file in the office of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. County of Sonoma v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Norton v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Peterson v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. LindholmCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  2. Griffith v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Torrealba v. KesmetisNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Smith Engineering Works v. CusterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  5. Morrissey v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API