Mitrovich v. Fresno Fruit Packing Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County and from an order denying a new trial. J. R. Webb, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, C.
Four certain persons were copartners, and in that capacity, on June 37, 1895, they entered into a contract in writing with Mitrovich, the plaintiff in this action, whereby *381he agreed to deliver to them the crop of figs to he obtained that, season from a certain orchard, and authorized them to pack and sell the same on his account for specified compensation; the dutics of which employment they on their part undertook to-discharge. Said contract contained also a provision allowing-to said partnership “the privilege of purchasing said described' figs at time of delivery at the agreed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Walsh v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Bergtholdt v. Porter Bros.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Malone v. Crescent City Mill & Transportation Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
- Robinson v. Nevada BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by4 opinions
- Parsons Manufacturing Co. v. Hamilton Ice Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
- Armstrong v. BarcelouxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Ceballos v. Munson Steamship LineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Post v. City and County BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919