Legal Opinion
Parsons Manufacturing Co. v. Hamilton Ice Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 7, 1909PublishedCited by 9 opinions
On application for a rule to show cause for a' new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Minturn, J.
The Hamilton lee Company, of Camden, New Jersey, and the plaintiff, entered into a contract for the conditional sale to the ice company of an automatic blower known as the “Parsons System.” The device was intended to regulate the draft upon the equipment of the ice company, and its cost was $1,300, payable in installments. The contract was signed on behalf of the ice company by N. B. Armstrong, manager, and the note in suit for a balance of $1,030 was given on January 15th, 1906, and was signed “Hamilton Ice Manufacturing Company, N. Bruce…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kirk v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Lattimore v. HarsenNew York Supreme Court · 1817
- Mitrovich v. Fresno Fruit Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
- Bullock v. Tompkins' EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by9 opinions
- McKee v. Harris-Seybold Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Jackson v. Diamond T. Trucking Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- NJ Transportation Dep't v. PSC Resources, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- G-I Holdings, Inc. v. BennetDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- MAYFAIR FARMS, ETC. v. Kruvant Enterprises Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.