Legal Opinion

Kondo v. Marietta Toyota, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 13, 1997No. A96A1886PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Presiding Judge.

On or about October 15, 1994, plaintiffs/appellants Masuo and Chiyo Kondo, husband and wife, went to defendant Marietta Toyota Inc.’s dealership (“Marietta Toyota”) to look at cars. Because plaintiffs were Japanese and limited in their ability to read and understand written English, they brought a friend with them to act as interpreter. After plaintiffs selected a 1994 Toyota Previa van, they were taken to the manager’s office to sign paperwork. During that time, they became separated from their interpreter who had gone to another office to help obtain verification of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dixon v. Midland InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Mobley v. Coast House, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  3. Chattahoochee Holdings, Inc. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Henderson v. Martin Burks Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Bennett v. D. L. Claborn Buick, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Catrett v. Landmark Dodge, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. Neal Pope, Inc. v. GarlingtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. Scott v. Team ToyotaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API