Legal Opinion

Neal Pope, Inc. v. Garlington

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 12, 2000No. A00A0462PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Presiding Judge.

Patrick Christopher Garlington filed suit against Neal Pope, Inc. after a car he bought from that company did not work properly. Following a hearing, the superior court granted partial summary judgment to Garlington based on Neal Pope’s failure to comply with the Fair Business Practices Act (“FBPA”), OCGA § 10-1-390 et seq., and with OCGA § 40-1-5 (a). The court denied Neal Pope’s motion for summary judgment and partially granted Garlington’s motion to compel discovery. Neal Pope appeals, arguing in three enumerations that the court erred. For the following reasons, we…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Crews v. Cisco Bros. Ford-Mercury, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  2. Owens v. Union City Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  3. Bob Maddox Dodge, Inc. v. McKieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Holman v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  5. Henderson v. Martin Burks Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Catrett v. Landmark Dodge, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. Krayev v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  3. Sergey Krayev v. David J. Johnson, Jr.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API