Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Martin Burks Chevrolet, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 14, 1987No. 74014PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Judge.

Appellant-plaintiffs brought suit, alleging that their purchase of a pickup truck had been fraudulently induced by misrepresentations made by the agents of appellee-defendant. At trial, appellee moved for a directed verdict on the ground that appellants had shown no evidence of fraud. Although appellee’s motion was granted as to the fraud issue, the trial court submitted the case to the jury on a theory *869of partial failure of consideration. The jury returned a verdict in appellants’ favor. The trial court subsequently granted appellee’s motion for judgment n.o.v. Appellants…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bill Spreen Toyota, Inc. v. JenquinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  2. Gem City Motors, Inc. v. MintonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  3. Horne v. Claude Ray Ford Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  4. Rustin Oldsmobile, Inc. v. KendricksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  5. General Motors Corp. v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Totz v. Continental Du Page AcuraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  2. Celex Group, Inc. v. Executive Gallery, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  3. Rivers v. BMW of North America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Bennett v. D. L. Claborn Buick, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  5. Hartley v. GagoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API