Legal Opinion

K & T, INC. v. Koroulis

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1994No. 930506PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Chief Justice:

Plaintiffs K & T, Inc., and Paul and Michael Taylor appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant Montana Brand Produce Co. We reverse and remand.

“Before we recite the facts, we note that in reviewing a grant of summary judgment, we view the facts and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.” Higgins v. Salt Lake County, 855 P.2d 231, 233 (Utah 1993). “We state the facts in this case accordingly.” Id.

K & T is a closely held Utah corporation which owns and operates a rental-car…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Higgins v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. LarsenUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Winegar v. Froerer Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. West v. Thomson NewspapersUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Ferree v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Orvis v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Harline v. BarkerUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Sharon Steel Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Berenda v. LangfordUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Stephens v. Bonneville Travel, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1997

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API