Legal Opinion
Marra v. Philadelphia Housing Authority
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 28, 2007No. 06-1140PublishedCited by 424 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
AMBRO, Circuit Judge.
The Philadelphia Housing Authority (“PHA”) appeals from jury verdicts in fa vor of plaintiffs Edward Marra and Albert DiGravio on their claims for unlawful retaliation under the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”), 43 P.S. §§ 951-963. PHA raises a host of challenges before us, contesting the admission of certain evidence at trial, the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the verdicts, and the consistency of those verdicts with particular findings made by the jury on the plaintiffs’ other claims for relief. PHA also argues, based on a misreading…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by424 opinions
- Sandra Connelly v. Lane Construction CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Dorothy Daniels v. Philadelphia School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Thomas Wisniewski v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Millicent Carvalho-Grevious v. Delaware State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Talavera v. ShahCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
419 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.