Legal Opinion

Gallucci v. Humbryd

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided April 28, 1998No. 96-84-AppealPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEDERBERG, Justice.

Was the testimony of an expert witness erroneously excluded in this medical malpractice ease? The trial justice barred certain expert testimony proffered by the plaintiffs, Carmine and Patricia Gallucei, then directed verdicts 1 and entered final judgments in favor of the defendants, Danny Humbyrd, M.D.; Stephen Lucci; Michael J. Infantolino, M.D., d.b.a. Gate Physical Therapy, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation and Gate Orthopedics. The plaintiffs, who alleged negligent postoperative physical therapy, have appealed those judgments to this Court. For the following…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. DeChristofaro v. MacHalaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  3. Alterio v. Biltmore Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  4. State v. CapalboSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
  5. Gorham v. PUBLIC BLDG. AUTH. OF CITY OF PROVIDENCESupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. DiPetrillo v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
  2. State v. GasparSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  3. Kurczy v. St. Joseph Veterans Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  4. State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  5. Raimbeault v. Takeuchi Manufacturing (U.S.), Ltd.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API