State v. Gaspar
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice SUTTELL,
for the Court.
The evidence adduced at the trial of this criminal case included testimony concerning a multitude of unconventional sexual practices but ultimately presented only one question for the jury’s determination: did the events of the night in question constitute a mutually consensual sexual encounter between two adults or a brutal sexual assault?
The defendant, Shane M. Gaspar, appeals from a Superior Court judgment of conviction on five counts of first-degree sexual assault resulting from events that unfolded on November 8, 2003. On appeal, defendant argues for…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Orange Jell BeechumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. VaroudakisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- State v. GrayhurstSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
- United States v. FrankhauserCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Coningford v. Rhode IslandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- State v. Charles PonaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
- State v. LopezSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
- State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.