In re Gibson
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
The question presented is whether the juvenile court had jurisdiction to entertain Gilbert’s complaint for visitation with his grandson. The court of appeals determined that the juvenile court lacked such jurisdiction. We affirm.
In In re Whitaker (1988), 36 Ohio St.3d 213, 522 N.E.2d 563, we discussed the status of grandparental visitation rights in the context of a dissolution of marriage. We stated that “Ohio has two statutes that confer visitation rights upon nonparents: R.C. 3109.11 and 3109.05(B).” Id. at 215, 522 N.E.2d at 565. After reviewing those statutes, we concluded that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Seventh Urban, Inc. v. University Circle Property Development, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
- In re WhitakerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Patrick v. PatrickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Williams v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- In RE MARRIAGE OF WESTRATE v. WestrateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fisher v. HasenjagerOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Braatz v. BraatzOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re A.B.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex rel. Reynolds v. KirbyOhio Supreme Court · 2023
- Haley v. Bank of Am. Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.