Legal Opinion

In re Gibson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1991No. 90-1049PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

The question presented is whether the juvenile court had jurisdiction to entertain Gilbert’s complaint for visitation with his grandson. The court of appeals determined that the juvenile court lacked such jurisdiction. We affirm.

In In re Whitaker (1988), 36 Ohio St.3d 213, 522 N.E.2d 563, we discussed the status of grandparental visitation rights in the context of a dissolution of marriage. We stated that “Ohio has two statutes that confer visitation rights upon nonparents: R.C. 3109.11 and 3109.05(B).” Id. at 215, 522 N.E.2d at 565. After reviewing those statutes, we concluded that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seventh Urban, Inc. v. University Circle Property Development, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. In re WhitakerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Patrick v. PatrickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Williams v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. In RE MARRIAGE OF WESTRATE v. WestrateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fisher v. HasenjagerOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Braatz v. BraatzOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In Re A.B.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State ex rel. Reynolds v. KirbyOhio Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Haley v. Bank of Am. Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API