Legal Opinion

Braatz v. Braatz

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1999No. 97-2566PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

The questions that have been certified for our consideration are (1) “Whether a moving party must demonstrate a change of circumstances for a trial court to modify its prior judgment regarding visitation? * * * At issue is whether R.C. 3109.04 or R.C. 3109.051 is applicable to a modification of visitation,” and (2) “Whether a trial court is required to set forth findings of fact and conclusions of law upon timely request in proceedings involving a modification of visitation.”

R.C. 3109.04 provides in pertinent part:

“(E)(1)(a) The court shall not modify a prior decree allocating parental rights…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davis v. FlickingerOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Booth v. BoothOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Wyss v. WyssOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. In re WhitakerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Patrick v. PatrickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In Re A.G.Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Fisher v. HasenjagerOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State ex rel. Mosier v. FornofOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State ex rel. Jones v. PaschkeOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Braden v. Braden, Unpublished Decision (12-22-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API